We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be nice to extend values clauses to support introducing multiple bindings, as it's currently just one i.e. you can do this:
(select [?ds ?title ?pub ?creator ?area ?resolution] [(values ?ds [:crime :deprivation]) (optional [[?ds :dcterms/spatial ?area] [?ds :dcat/spatialResolutionInMeters ?resolution]]) (optional [[?ds :dcterms/publisher ?pub]]) (optional [[?ds :dcterms/creator ?creator]])] data)
But not this:
(select [?ds ?title ?pub ?creator ?area ?resolution] [(values [?ds ?title] [[:crime "Crimes"] [:deprivation "Indicies of Multiple Deprivation"]]) (optional [[?ds :dcterms/spatial ?area] [?ds :dcat/spatialResolutionInMeters ?resolution]]) (optional [[?ds :dcterms/publisher ?pub]]) (optional [[?ds :dcterms/creator ?creator]])] data)
It would be nice to support the above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It would be nice to extend values clauses to support introducing multiple bindings, as it's currently just one i.e. you can do this:
But not this:
It would be nice to support the above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: