Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question]: How do I disable IDFA #57

Open
cainaleaouk opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

[Question]: How do I disable IDFA #57

cainaleaouk opened this issue Jul 17, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@cainaleaouk
Copy link

Hi there,

as the title says, I'd like to disable IDFA collection since our app cannot use it. Is there a way to do something similar to this?
https://developers.amplitude.com/docs/disabling-automatic-tracking-of-properties#disabling-tracking-on-ios

Cheers.

@SudoPlz
Copy link
Owner

SudoPlz commented Jul 17, 2020

Not currently, but you're super welcome to open a PR that adds that functionality.
It should be fairly easy.

@ilyakar
Copy link

ilyakar commented Oct 12, 2020

Same. We have a kid's app and all references to IDFA-related stuff have to be gone.

A much better behaviour would be to use IDFA only if AdSupport.framework is in the project, if not then it should not.

Any update on this?

@Alex123456780
Copy link
Contributor

Amplitude uses IDFV by default and not IDFA. See FAQ here.

@SudoPlz SudoPlz closed this as completed Nov 6, 2020
@ilyakar
Copy link

ilyakar commented Nov 6, 2020

Not true. Apple rejections happen due to IDFA reasons. I turned to the JS SDK instead to avoid this problem.

@SudoPlz SudoPlz reopened this Nov 6, 2020
@Alex123456780
Copy link
Contributor

@ilyakar you can try to ask Amplitude's technical support about your problem (e.g. "i don't activate IDFA usage, your SDK disables IDFA by default, but Apple rejects my app anyway").

@ilyakar
Copy link

ilyakar commented Nov 7, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants