-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Review and test out git based documentation system for Sinar NGOs #27
Comments
Had tested and stored review elsewhere, pasting here for review.
For above, can see this comparison of ReadTheDocs vs Gitbooks.io
There are several Python-based static site generators that work with Markdown. One of the most popular is Pelican. Here's a brief overview: 1. Pelican
If you are comfortable with Python and want something other than MkDocs, Pelican is an excellent choice due to its flexibility and active community. 2. Lektor
3. Nikola
|
Basic structure and workflow of ReadTheDocs (RTD) and MkDocs for generating Git-based site documentation.
Both RTD and MkDocs are tools to generate static site documentation from source files. While RTD traditionally uses Sphinx and reStructuredText, MkDocs uses its generator and Markdown. Both can be integrated with version control systems (like Git) to automate the generation and deployment of updated documentation. |
GitBook allows for documentation generation and hosting, but it has its distinct flow and user interface. Here's a block diagram representation of how GitBook works for generating Git-based site documentation:
Explanation:
With GitBook, the advantage is the seamless integration of a Git workflow with a rich, web-based editing experience. It merges the strengths of version control and a user-friendly documentation platform. Many civic tech has reduced the usage of Gitbook since 2016/17 once they changed the business model and linitations to the free versions. |
|
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: