You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Has anyone tried to benchmark UQPy against other python packages for PCE analysis such as Chaospy? I have found few bottlenecks on the latter library, especially regarding the efficiency of generation of polynomial expansions and evaluation of surrogates. For a full-order polynomial expansion with 15 unkowns and 6th order polynomials, I am already at 55k expansion elements. My analysis starts to take a huge amount of memory for 20k evaluations (with 10 targets) and long times.
Also is it possible to extract the sensing matrices as numpy arrays and operate on them on our own? For example evaluate LOO error with our own logic, or use different regression methods.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Has anyone tried to benchmark UQPy against other python packages for PCE analysis such as Chaospy? I have found few bottlenecks on the latter library, especially regarding the efficiency of generation of polynomial expansions and evaluation of surrogates. For a full-order polynomial expansion with 15 unkowns and 6th order polynomials, I am already at 55k expansion elements. My analysis starts to take a huge amount of memory for 20k evaluations (with 10 targets) and long times.
Also is it possible to extract the sensing matrices as numpy arrays and operate on them on our own? For example evaluate LOO error with our own logic, or use different regression methods.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions