Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differentiate external and internal links #24

Open
DieterDePaepe opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Differentiate external and internal links #24

DieterDePaepe opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@DieterDePaepe
Copy link
Contributor

Many of the links in the slides refer to other slides, while a few refer to external pages.
As a learner, I'm more interested in external pages than internal pages (since I'll encounter those anyway, being the avid reader that I am). It would handy to easily see which links are external and which are not.

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Owner

That makes sense and is actually quite easy to achieve with CSS, the question is just what would be a good visual indicator. Any suggestions? The indicator might also only be applied on hover.

@DieterDePaepe
Copy link
Contributor Author

Two ideas come to mind:

  • using a dotted underline for internal links
  • adding a small background image next to the link (stole this idea from Redmine)

I'd prefer if the indicator is always visible, not just when hovering.

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Owner

Was also thinking about the dotted underline, just wonder if it isn't too subtle.

The background image would then be too invasive, and change text flow. Images before links do remind me of good old times on the Web though 😉

@Dromin
Copy link

Dromin commented Mar 17, 2016

The indicator might also only be applied on hover.

Side note: anything that is only visible on hover will be (mostly) unusable on touch devices.

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh modified the milestone: 2017–2018 Jun 2, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants