Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a “Publication Search” option, similar to Gene List, but to search for keywords in papers #758

Open
Arnedeklerk opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement Use this for a change about existing functionality, use 'new feature' for new functionality. new feature Use this for new functionality, for changes about existing features use 'enhancement'.

Comments

@Arnedeklerk
Copy link
Member

As KnetMiner stores publication abstract information, we can create an additional search for searching over the abstracts of only publications. A publication-centric search, possibly with Publications as the centre node, which would also help for creating a publication version of GenePage.

This could potentially also work better simply as a standalone search in KnetMiner 6.0
Something like:
image

Based on #304.

@Arnedeklerk Arnedeklerk added enhancement Use this for a change about existing functionality, use 'new feature' for new functionality. new feature Use this for new functionality, for changes about existing features use 'enhancement'. labels Jun 5, 2023
@marco-brandizi
Copy link
Member

Is this a knetminer feature or a knetmaps feature? More in general, if you want to use the issues section of the knetminer repo to manage all the issues about all the other projects/repos, we have to agree upon it.

I'm not a fan of it, but it could work. I'm not at all a fan of making all tickets completely non-public, certainly not those related to open source projects.

@Arnedeklerk
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @marco-brandizi.

The search functionality isn't a part of KnetMaps-Plus, that's a seperate search. This search is part of KnetMiner (in the screenshot KnetMaps will fill the blank space on the right), so I think here (publically) is fine. Happy to discuss Friday.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Use this for a change about existing functionality, use 'new feature' for new functionality. new feature Use this for new functionality, for changes about existing features use 'enhancement'.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants