-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FEATURE] *Provide the power system mismatch* #259
Comments
The power flow results already include the node injection power which is calculated by network parameters. At the same time all appliances have their power values by appliance parameters. The difference of these two is the power mismatch. I am hesitating to provide additional attributes for the mismatch. The user can easily calculate this by himself. @petersalemink95 what do you think? |
Hi, Maybe not the mismatch vector but the norm |
a potentially useful consideration here is the following:
|
@mgovers even with columnar dataset we are not dealing with memory issue. The calculation itself still cost some CPU time. It might not be very much. But indeed, with columnar dataset we are more permissive to add new attributes. That's why I keep this issue open. |
Detailing the steps for finding mismatch in power after calculation. Correct me if I am wrong:
How about we provide a utility function to do this? |
It would be nice if the results would provide the nodal power mismatch or the norm of this.
This is the stopping criteria for Newton Raphson.
For methods that use voltage iteration similarity as criteria (i.e. Backwards-Forward) provide the power mismatch as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: