Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade swagger-annotations 1.6.14 -> 1.6.15 #1517

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
io.swagger:swagger-annotations compile patch 1.6.14 -> 1.6.15

Release Notes

swagger-api/swagger-core (io.swagger:swagger-annotations)

v1.6.15: Swagger-core 1.6.15 released!

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: swagger-api/swagger-core@v1.6.14...v1.6.15


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-DevPla-Bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade swagger-annotations 1.6.14 -> 1.6.15 (#1517)

See:
- https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/releases/tag/v1.6.15
- https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-core/compare/v1.6.14...v1.6.15

@rickie rickie added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Jan 16, 2025
@rickie
Copy link
Member

rickie commented Jan 16, 2025

Hmm, this should've been Swagger as title I believe...

Copy link
Member

@Stephan202 Stephan202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For this 1.x line we've used swagger-annotations so far 👀. (But I agree it's off.)

Updated the suggested commit message.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 changed the title Upgrade io.swagger:swagger-annotations 1.6.14 -> 1.6.15 Upgrade swagger-annotations 1.6.14 -> 1.6.15 Jan 16, 2025
@Stephan202
Copy link
Member

Will let you merge in case you want to change it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants