Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request to speak list is empty #4271

Open
MSoeb opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Request to speak list is empty #4271

MSoeb opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@MSoeb
Copy link

MSoeb commented Oct 17, 2024

Describe the bug
The requests to speak list in the imprint is empty.

image

How to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. open a meeting
  2. open agenda > create an item
  3. open participants > create a user with a structure level
  4. project the agenda item
  5. open Autopilot > add user to list of speakers > start and stop the speech
  6. open the imprint > Requests to speak > check the list

Expected behavior
The Requests to speak list should list all structure levels with it's accumulated times.

Additional context

@MSoeb MSoeb added the bug label Oct 17, 2024
@MSoeb MSoeb added this to the 4.2 milestone Oct 17, 2024
@reiterl reiterl assigned reiterl and unassigned reiterl Nov 4, 2024
@reiterl
Copy link
Member

reiterl commented Nov 4, 2024

It seems that the subscription meeting_info_<nr> doesn't work like expected. I tried to change the subscription without success. I think @bastianjoel needs to help me here.

@reiterl
Copy link
Member

reiterl commented Nov 6, 2024

A user in a meeting can have n structure levels.
The request count does count speakers and time.
In general speakers don't have a connection to a structure level.
So this issue is not solvable in general.

@reiterl
Copy link
Member

reiterl commented Nov 6, 2024

As @Elblinator found out: In parlament mode (special meeting setting) there could be a connection between speakers and structure levels.

@reiterl reiterl assigned rrenkert and unassigned MSoeb Nov 6, 2024
@reiterl
Copy link
Member

reiterl commented Nov 6, 2024

@rrenkert Please evaluate, how to continue here.

@rrenkert
Copy link
Member

rrenkert commented Nov 6, 2024

Talked to @MSoeb: We see the problem here and maybe we want to implement a bigger solution with some more statistics. Please stop here and wait for futher information.

@rrenkert rrenkert removed their assignment Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants