Request for a kernel #1
Comments
bgcngm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
…alid [ Upstream commit f2f11fca5d7112e2f91c4854cddd68a059fdaa4a ] If smb2 request from client is invalid, The following kernel oops could happen. The patch e2b76ab8b5c9: "ksmbd: add support for read compound" leads this issue. When request is invalid, It doesn't set anything in the response buffer. This patch add missing set invalid parameter error response. [ 673.085542] ksmbd: cli req too short, len 184 not 142. cmd:5 mid:109 [ 673.085580] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 [ 673.085591] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 673.085600] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 673.085608] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 673.085620] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 673.085631] CPU: 3 PID: 1039 Comm: kworker/3:0 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc2-tmt #16 [ 673.085643] Hardware name: AZW U59/U59, BIOS JTKT001 05/05/2022 [ 673.085651] Workqueue: ksmbd-io handle_ksmbd_work [ksmbd] [ 673.085719] RIP: 0010:ksmbd_conn_write+0x68/0xc0 [ksmbd] [ 673.085808] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88811ade4f00 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 673.085817] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88810c2a9780 RDI: ffff88810c2a9ac0 [ 673.085826] RBP: ffffc900005e3e00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 673.085834] R10: ffffffffa3168160 R11: 63203a64626d736b R12: ffff8881057c8800 [ 673.085842] R13: ffff8881057c8820 R14: ffff8882781b2380 R15: ffff8881057c8800 [ 673.085852] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888278180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 673.085864] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 673.085872] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000015b63c000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0 [ 673.085883] Call Trace: [ 673.085890] <TASK> [ 673.085900] ? show_regs+0x6a/0x80 [ 673.085916] ? __die+0x25/0x70 [ 673.085926] ? page_fault_oops+0x154/0x4b0 [ 673.085938] ? tick_nohz_tick_stopped+0x18/0x50 [ 673.085954] ? __irq_work_queue_local+0xba/0x140 [ 673.085967] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x30f/0x6c0 [ 673.085979] ? exc_page_fault+0x79/0x180 [ 673.085992] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [ 673.086009] ? ksmbd_conn_write+0x68/0xc0 [ksmbd] [ 673.086067] ? ksmbd_conn_write+0x46/0xc0 [ksmbd] [ 673.086123] handle_ksmbd_work+0x28d/0x4b0 [ksmbd] [ 673.086177] process_one_work+0x178/0x350 [ 673.086193] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 673.086202] worker_thread+0x2f3/0x420 [ 673.086210] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x27/0x50 [ 673.086222] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 673.086230] kthread+0x103/0x140 [ 673.086242] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 673.086253] ret_from_fork+0x39/0x60 [ 673.086263] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 673.086274] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 Fixes: e2b76ab8b5c9 ("ksmbd: add support for read compound") Reported-by: Tom Talpey <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
bgcngm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 807252f028c59b9a3bac4d62ad84761548c10f11 ]
Running smb2.rename test from Samba smbtorture suite against a kernel built
with lockdep triggers a "possible recursive locking detected" warning.
This is because mnt_want_write() is called twice with no mnt_drop_write()
in between:
-> ksmbd_vfs_mkdir()
-> ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_create()
-> kern_path_create()
-> filename_create()
-> mnt_want_write()
-> mnt_want_write()
Fix this by removing the mnt_want_write/mnt_drop_write calls from vfs
helpers that call kern_path_create().
Full lockdep trace below:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.6.0-rc5 #775 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/1:1/32 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_mkdir+0xe1/0x410
but task is already holding lock:
ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(sb_writers#5);
lock(sb_writers#5);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/1:1/32:
#0: ffff8880064e4138 ((wq_completion)ksmbd-io){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980
#1: ffff888005b0fdd0 ((work_completion)(&work->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x40e/0x980
#2: ffff888005ac83f8 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: filename_create+0xb6/0x260
#3: ffff8880057ce760 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x123/0x260
Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 40b268d384a2 ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions")
Signed-off-by: Marios Makassikis <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
bgcngm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 864fb5d3716303a045c3ffb397f651bfd37bfb36 ]
[ 8743.393379] ======================================================
[ 8743.393385] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 8743.393391] 6.4.0-rc1+ #11 Tainted: G OE
[ 8743.393397] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 8743.393402] kworker/0:2/12921 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 8743.393408] ffff888127a14460 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksmbd_vfs_setxattr+0x3d/0xd0 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.393510]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 8743.393515] ffff8880360d97f0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ksmbd_vfs_kern_path_locked+0x181/0x670 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.393618]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 8743.393623]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 8743.393628]
-> #1 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 8743.393648] down_write_nested+0x9a/0x1b0
[ 8743.393660] filename_create+0x128/0x270
[ 8743.393670] do_mkdirat+0xab/0x1f0
[ 8743.393680] __x64_sys_mkdir+0x47/0x60
[ 8743.393690] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x90
[ 8743.393701] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
[ 8743.393711]
-> #0 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}-{0:0}:
[ 8743.393728] __lock_acquire+0x2201/0x3b80
[ 8743.393737] lock_acquire+0x18f/0x440
[ 8743.393746] mnt_want_write+0x5f/0x240
[ 8743.393755] ksmbd_vfs_setxattr+0x3d/0xd0 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.393839] ksmbd_vfs_set_dos_attrib_xattr+0xcc/0x110 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.393924] compat_ksmbd_vfs_set_dos_attrib_xattr+0x39/0x50 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.394010] smb2_open+0x3432/0x3cc0 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.394099] handle_ksmbd_work+0x2c9/0x7b0 [ksmbd]
[ 8743.394187] process_one_work+0x65a/0xb30
[ 8743.394198] worker_thread+0x2cf/0x700
[ 8743.394209] kthread+0x1ad/0x1f0
[ 8743.394218] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
This patch add mnt_want_write() above parent inode lock and remove
nested mnt_want_write calls in smb2_open().
Fixes: 40b268d384a2 ("ksmbd: add mnt_want_write to ksmbd vfs functions")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Marios Makassikis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
bgcngm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 14694179e561b5f2f7e56a0f590e2cb49a9cc7ab ]
Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep
warning:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
sh/92 is trying to acquire lock:
c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
but task is already holding lock:
c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
6 locks held by sh/92:
#0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178
#1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284
#2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284
#3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8
#4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c
#5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532
Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5
unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48
dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c
__lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0
lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
__irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204
irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4
atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204
irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8
gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248
dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c
__device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c
dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8
dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84
suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8
pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4
state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284
kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4
vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178
ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0)
3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001
3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190
3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26
This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever
a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will
lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent"
IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks
share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue.
Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and
children IRQ
Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller")
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
bgcngm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 90d025c2e953c11974e76637977c473200593a46 ] If server replied SMB2_NEGOTIATE with a zero SecurityBufferOffset, smb2_get_data_area() sets @len to non-zero but return NULL, so decode_negTokeninit() ends up being called with a NULL @security_blob: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 871 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:asn1_ber_decoder+0x173/0xc80 Code: 01 4c 39 2c 24 75 09 45 84 c9 0f 85 2f 03 00 00 48 8b 14 24 4c 29 ea 48 83 fa 01 0f 86 1e 07 00 00 48 8b 74 24 28 4d 8d 5d 01 <42> 0f b6 3c 2e 89 fa 40 88 7c 24 5c f7 d2 83 e2 1f 0f 84 3d 07 00 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000063f950 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000000000000004a RDX: 000000000000004a RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000000000000004d R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007fce52b0fbc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000001ae64000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? __stack_depot_save+0x1e6/0x480 ? exc_page_fault+0x6f/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? asn1_ber_decoder+0x173/0xc80 ? check_object+0x40/0x340 decode_negTokenInit+0x1e/0x30 [cifs] SMB2_negotiate+0xc99/0x17c0 [cifs] ? smb2_negotiate+0x46/0x60 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 smb2_negotiate+0x46/0x60 [cifs] cifs_negotiate_protocol+0xae/0x130 [cifs] cifs_get_smb_ses+0x517/0x1040 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? queue_delayed_work_on+0x5d/0x90 cifs_mount_get_session+0x78/0x200 [cifs] dfs_mount_share+0x13a/0x9f0 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 ? find_nls+0x16/0x80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 cifs_mount+0x7e/0x350 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x128/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fce52c2ab1e Fix this by setting @len to zero when @off == 0 so callers won't attempt to dereference non-existing data areas. Reported-by: Robert Morris <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
bgcngm
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 16, 2024
[ Upstream commit 3a42709fa909e22b0be4bb1e2795aa04ada732a3 ] Validate @ioctl_rsp->OutputOffset and @ioctl_rsp->OutputCount so that their sum does not wrap to a number that is smaller than @reparse_buf and we end up with a wild pointer as follows: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff88809c5cd45f #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 4a01067 P4D 4a01067 PUD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 1260 Comm: mount.cifs Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] Code: ff ff e8 f3 51 fe ff 41 89 c6 58 5a 45 85 f6 0f 85 14 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 48 8b 42 60 44 8b 42 64 42 8d 0c 00 49 39 4f 50 72 40 <8b> 04 02 48 8b 9d f0 fe ff ff 49 8b 57 50 89 03 48 8b 9d e8 fe ff RSP: 0018:ffffc90000347a90 EFLAGS: 00010212 RAX: 000000008000001f RBX: ffff88800ae11000 RCX: 00000000000000ec RDX: ffff88801c5cd440 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff82004aa4 RBP: ffffc90000347bb0 R08: 00000000800000cd R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000024 R12: ffff8880114d4100 R13: ffff8880114d4198 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880114d4000 FS: 00007f02c07babc0(0000) GS:ffff88806ba00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffff88809c5cd45f CR3: 0000000011750000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x23/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x181/0x480 ? search_module_extables+0x19/0x60 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? exc_page_fault+0x1b6/0x1c0 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 ? smb2_query_reparse_point+0x3e0/0x4c0 [cifs] cifs_get_fattr+0x16e/0xa50 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0 cifs_root_iget+0x163/0x5f0 [cifs] cifs_smb3_do_mount+0x5bd/0x780 [cifs] smb3_get_tree+0xd9/0x290 [cifs] vfs_get_tree+0x2c/0x100 ? capable+0x37/0x70 path_mount+0x2d7/0xb80 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 __x64_sys_mount+0x11a/0x150 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7f02c08d5b1e Fixes: 2e4564b ("smb3: add support for stat of WSL reparse points for special file types") Cc: [email protected] Reported-by: Robert Morris <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello sir,
Could you please build a nethunter kernel with rtl8188eu and ub400 driver support with this kernel source? Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: