You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
m/z and intensity are embedded to yield peak embedding by FloatEncoder in depthcharge,both are sinusoidal embedding.But in your paper,m/z and intensity are embedded separately,and intensity is embedded through a linear layer.So which way do you do it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @XiaojieGan - the published versions of Casanovo using a sinusoidal embedding for the m/z values and a linear projection for the intensity values. However, in more recent versions of the underlying library, Depthcharge, I've switched to using a second sinusoidal embedding as you noted.
#350 Is the PR upgrading to this new version of Depthcharge.
Thanks for your answer.So you embedded both m/z and intensity by sinusoidal embedding in your implementation.I‘d like to take this approach,but I don't know it's effect.
Hi @XiaojieGan - the published versions of Casanovo using a sinusoidal embedding for the m/z values and a linear projection for the intensity values. However, in more recent versions of the underlying library, Depthcharge, I've switched to using a second sinusoidal embedding as you noted.
#350 Is the PR upgrading to this new version of Depthcharge.
In your ablation experiment,there are a variety of approaches to be mentioned. "Sinusoidal I embedding",intensity is embedded by sinusoidal embedding. But "Standard Casanovo" using a linear projection for the intensity,how did you do it?
m/z and intensity are embedded to yield peak embedding by FloatEncoder in depthcharge,both are sinusoidal embedding.But in your paper,m/z and intensity are embedded separately,and intensity is embedded through a linear layer.So which way do you do it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: