Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build failure: fava #325945

Closed
jansol opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Build failure: fava #325945

jansol opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@jansol
Copy link
Contributor

jansol commented Jul 9, 2024

Steps To Reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. build fava

Build log

error: builder for '/nix/store/v7fvpx477mapij2p71pivvyh2bjblfml-fava-1.27.3.drv' failed with exit code 1;
       last 10 log lines:
       > adding 'fava-1.27.3.dist-info/top_level.txt'
       > adding 'fava-1.27.3.dist-info/RECORD'
       > removing build/bdist.linux-x86_64/wheel
       > Successfully built fava-1.27.3-py3-none-any.whl
       > Finished creating a wheel...
       > Finished executing pypaBuildPhase
       > Running phase: pythonRuntimeDepsCheckHook
       > Executing pythonRuntimeDepsCheck
       > Checking runtime dependencies for fava-1.27.3-py3-none-any.whl
       >   - beancount<3,>=2.3.5 not satisfied by version 3.0.0
       For full logs, run 'nix log /nix/store/v7fvpx477mapij2p71pivvyh2bjblfml-fava-1.27.3.drv'.

Additional context

There is a newer upstream release tag but it seems to still require beancount 2.3.6

Notify maintainers

@bhipple

Metadata

NixOS Unstable via flakes.

[user@system:~]$ nix-shell -p nix-info --run "nix-info -m"
 - system: `"x86_64-linux"`
 - host os: `Linux 6.9.7, NixOS, 24.11 (Vicuna), 24.11.20240703.9f4128e`
 - multi-user?: `yes`
 - sandbox: `yes`
 - version: `nix-env (Nix) 2.18.4`
 - nixpkgs: `/nix/store/dk2rpyb6ndvfbf19bkb2plcz5y3k8i5v-source`

Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.

@dotlambda
Copy link
Member

Fava is not compatible with Beancount v3 yet: beancount/fava#1831

@lunik1
Copy link
Contributor

lunik1 commented Jul 12, 2024

Should beancount v2 be packaged separately? It is still recommended by beancount's README.

@kilianar
Copy link
Contributor

I believe the README is not up to date with the latest release. The section discussing the various branches was added four years ago and hasn't been updated since. Martin Blais, the main author, mentioned in the announcement of v3 on Google Groups:

You should not use v2 anymore.

However, it might be reasonable to retain v2 temporarily to ensure fava continues to work until it supports beancount v3.

@bhipple
Copy link
Contributor

bhipple commented Jul 17, 2024

Should be resolved by #327531

@bhipple bhipple closed this as completed Jul 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants