Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unexpected imported scalar boundary conditions from nek #507

Open
stgeke opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Unexpected imported scalar boundary conditions from nek #507

stgeke opened this issue Jun 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@stgeke
Copy link
Collaborator

stgeke commented Jun 28, 2023

Each boundary ID (or tag) must be associated with a specific boundary type. When importing boundary conditions from Nek5000, boundary IDs are typically absent, except when the mesh is imported via one of the available mesh converters. In cases without boundary IDs, we use a heuristic approach to generate them by mapping each boundary type to an ID. While this approach is effective in most situations, it can occasionally result in wrong BCs in specific cases.

I cannot think of a good and robust fix for this.
Suggested workaround: define boundary IDs in nek and specify types in par

@stgeke stgeke added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 28, 2023
@stgeke stgeke changed the title Incorrect imported scalar boundary conditions from nek Unexpected imported scalar boundary conditions from nek Feb 3, 2024
@stgeke stgeke added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Feb 3, 2024
@fischer1
Copy link
Contributor

fischer1 commented Feb 3, 2024

THere is a simple work around that involves counting.
We should fix this to support Nek.

@stgeke stgeke removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Feb 3, 2024
@Nek5000 Nek5000 deleted a comment from fischer1 Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants