You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just found that that atomic charges of part of the molecules are different in gromacs_solvated.tar.gz and gromacs.tar.gz.
Such as the mobley_820789, the atomic charges in gromacs/mobley_820789.top are:
While in gromacs_solvated/mobley_820789.top:
That's quite different. And only the parameters in gromacs/mobley_820789.top can reproduce the result in literature.
Openff-toolkit was used to regenerate the atomic charges of mobley_820789 with gaff-1.8, and the regenerated charges were consistent with the content in gromacs/mobley_820789.top.
How did the charges in gromacs_solvated generated? And was it processed after gaff-1.7?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just found that that atomic charges of part of the molecules are different in gromacs_solvated.tar.gz and gromacs.tar.gz.
Such as the mobley_820789, the atomic charges in gromacs/mobley_820789.top are:
While in gromacs_solvated/mobley_820789.top:
That's quite different. And only the parameters in gromacs/mobley_820789.top can reproduce the result in literature.
Openff-toolkit was used to regenerate the atomic charges of mobley_820789 with gaff-1.8, and the regenerated charges were consistent with the content in gromacs/mobley_820789.top.
How did the charges in gromacs_solvated generated? And was it processed after gaff-1.7?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: