-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DRY_RUN mode's performance #14
Comments
The |
Thank you, there are another 2 questions I would like to ask:
|
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I would like to ask about coco training and test performance on DRY_RUN mode. I use DRY_RUN on each command you mentioned, including extract globals, objects and blocks features. When I run:
DRY_RUN=True TRAIN_WITH_VAL_DATASET=True torchrun --nproc_per_node=4 -m oadp.dp.train oadp_ov_coco configs/dp/oadp_ov_coco.py --override .validator.dataloader.dataset.ann_file::data/coco/annotations/instances_val2017.48.json
The DP training for coco, the result be like:
I got a ridiculous result: 0.8614 mAP, there must be something wrong, but I check my process, data structure and commands, all these are following your steps. So is DRY_RUN makes this unreal result and I should turn to run without DRY_RUN?(By the way, extract globals, objects and blocks features on DRY_RUN seems to be smaller than without DRY_RUN's, so I should download from Baidu disk?)
Thanks for your attention and impressive work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: