Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please add specialization cl::Program::build(cl::Device&) #60

Closed
sirzooro opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #102
Closed

Please add specialization cl::Program::build(cl::Device&) #60

sirzooro opened this issue May 13, 2019 · 3 comments · Fixed by #102

Comments

@sirzooro
Copy link

It is possible to create cl::Context using cl::Device instead of std::vector<cl::Device>, so it would be nice to use cl::Program::build in the same way.

BTW, this special constructor of cl::Context is not documented in opencl-cplusplus-1.2.pdf, please add it there.

@kpet kpet transferred this issue from KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Headers May 31, 2019
@kpet
Copy link
Contributor

kpet commented May 31, 2019

Thanks for the report, this seems like a good idea.

@kpet kpet added the agenda Needs Working Group Discussion label May 31, 2019
@kpet
Copy link
Contributor

kpet commented May 31, 2019

Adding the agenda label to discuss the process around opencl-cplusplus-1.2.pdf.

@bashbaug
Copy link
Contributor

bashbaug commented Jun 9, 2020

I just created #102 to add the requested build interface - thank you for the suggestion!

Regarding the PDF documentation, after discussing in the working group teleconference I have created KhronosGroup/OpenCL-Registry#83, which removes the PDF documentation from the registry webpage. As you have observed, the PDFs have grown stale and out of date. Instead, we recommend referring to the Doxygen documentation, which is easier to keep up-to-date.

Please also feel free to track #65, which will automatically generate and publish Doxygen comments when the headers change.

@bashbaug bashbaug removed the agenda Needs Working Group Discussion label Jun 9, 2020
@kpet kpet closed this as completed in #102 Sep 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants