Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Path for LV bridge isolation fails #14

Open
jab0707 opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Path for LV bridge isolation fails #14

jab0707 opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@jab0707
Copy link
Contributor

jab0707 commented Feb 13, 2024

I am having trouble on a mesh that has worked in the past. It is failing to identify the path along the surface to find the cutoff for the LV bridge. The starting points all look fine:
image
However, there is no path generated for the LV bridge closest to the TV:
image

I am trying to dig into the createGraphandSplitMesh.m. It is failing to find a path on line 176:

path1MvAv = shortestpath(GsubLv, nodeIndexLocalMvMin80, nodeIndexLocalAv80);

I suspect it has to do with how the GsubLv was clipped. The septum definition on this mesh does not look ideal:
image
However, I am not sure what to change to make that septum classification more reasonable near the septal side of the MV

@jab0707
Copy link
Contributor Author

jab0707 commented Feb 13, 2024

Looking into it more, the septum definition is based on the o.m1.ridgeLaplace solution. Plotting that I see that it does indeed have a little bit in the MV valve plane that is causing the issue when the graph is split into the LV and RV parts. This part of the septum being cut out is preventing the path from being drawn. Is there a reason that the septum cannot be a part of the graphs for the LV or RV when cutting the bridges?

image

@jab0707
Copy link
Contributor Author

jab0707 commented Feb 13, 2024

I re-segmented a bit around the valve plane and the resulting septum classification looked better. However, it seems like this might be a bit of a fiddly step.
image

@lisapankewitz
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @jab0707 ,
Thanks for the issue. I am currently a bit constrained as I am trying to finish up.

May I ask you how your input/boundary surfaces look like?
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants