Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Seeking other's benchmarks #7

Open
JeffreySarnoff opened this issue Jun 22, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Seeking other's benchmarks #7

JeffreySarnoff opened this issue Jun 22, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@JeffreySarnoff
Copy link
Owner

@KlausC Everything is reworked; I am using one type rather than two for each FastRational.
There can be no clashes of expected types now. And, fortuitously, it does live up to its name.

Would you mind getting the current master and running the benchmarks file, then just cut and paste whatever it prints in this issue. It would be good to average some results rather than just use my computer's timings. Of course, let me know of anything else you may notice. Thank you.

@KlausC
Copy link
Contributor

KlausC commented Jun 24, 2019

The reported speedup is really impressive for small integers. I added my versioninfo() for reference.
`
julia> print(relspeeds)
relative speeds
(32) (64)
mul: 30.6 28.3
muladd: 21.5 21.6
add: 17.4 17.4
poly: 14.2 27.2
matmul: 10.3 12.5
matlu: 2.1 2.2
matinv: 2.8 2.6

julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 1.0.4
Commit 38e9fb7f80 (2019-05-16 03:38 UTC)
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-redhat-linux)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3610QM CPU @ 2.30GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-6.0.0 (ORCJIT, ivybridge)
Environment:
JULIA_EDITOR = /usr/bin/vim -R -c"set nonumber"
`

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants