Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plan going forward? #1

Open
JMLX42 opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Plan going forward? #1

JMLX42 opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@JMLX42
Copy link
Owner

JMLX42 commented Jan 16, 2018

Original message posted in a commit:

Hi Jean-Marc

I am starting to teach Smart Contracts at the University of Pennsylvania.

We have been playing with exactly this approach to create a teaching environment.

So thank you for work.

What is your plan going forward?

Sincerely

David

@JMLX42
Copy link
Owner Author

JMLX42 commented Jan 16, 2018

Hi David,

I don't have much time to improve this project as of now.
But the code is clean enough for others to build on.

Do you need anything in particular ?

@dcrosbie
Copy link

Hello Jean-Marc

No, I wanted to tell you what we were doing - potentially with your code, and I wanted to know if you were just doing this for fun?

I could not get to your personal website - the link from github is broken.

My email is (dcrosbie at upenn.edu) if you would like to email me directly.

Sincerely

David Crosbie

@rekmarks
Copy link

Jean-Marc,

I work with David and have been working with a fork of your repo. I have a couple of questions concerning your to-do's:

  1. You already implemented typed state variables, which would be sufficient for many contracts. What were your intentions with variables and scoped variables?

  2. How and where (live, Ropsten/Rinkeby, etc.) did you intend to deploy the generated smart contracts?

Best,
Erik

@JMLX42
Copy link
Owner Author

JMLX42 commented Jan 17, 2018

No, I wanted to tell you what we were doing - potentially with your code, and I wanted to know if you were just doing this for fun?

For now, just for fun yes.

And even if I had plans to make a business out of anything related to Ethereum/Solidity, I would still keep this project open source and free.

You already implemented typed state variables, which would be sufficient for many contracts. What were your intentions with variables and scoped variables?

Some contracts need actual scoped variables. So we need a way to declare/assign them. And... that's just it.

How and where (live, Ropsten/Rinkeby, etc.) did you intend to deploy the generated smart contracts?

I've not been that far. I just made sure the generated code compiles with solc and that's it.

Pull requests are welcome :)

@rekmarks
Copy link

Great, you're very helpful, thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants