You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I like your paper so i read your released code. Then the following confusion comes to me. The adjacencies is put forward into the training process to represent the graph structure, and the v in adjacencies is obtained solely from train_batcher['rel']. It seens that the 'rel_reserve' is excluded in the training process. But in evaluation, the (e2, rel_reverse, adjacencies) is put forward into the model. I am confused, if the model doesn't see the 'rel_reverse' in the training then how could it handle the 'rel_reverse' in evaluation? Looking forward to hearing from you soon. Best wise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I like your paper so i read your released code. Then the following confusion comes to me. The adjacencies is put forward into the training process to represent the graph structure, and the v in adjacencies is obtained solely from train_batcher['rel']. It seens that the 'rel_reserve' is excluded in the training process. But in evaluation, the (e2, rel_reverse, adjacencies) is put forward into the model. I am confused, if the model doesn't see the 'rel_reverse' in the training then how could it handle the 'rel_reverse' in evaluation? Looking forward to hearing from you soon. Best wise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: