-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Model of Data in Clearing House #532
Labels
enhancement
ticket proposing an improvement, extension of exisitng or new features
Milestone
Comments
Thank you for raising this! Could you please state the additional fields you need? A solution could indeed add additional fields to |
JohannesLipp
added
the
enhancement
ticket proposing an improvement, extension of exisitng or new features
label
Jan 13, 2022
The meta-data fields we store currently are:
|
Task:
|
Updated requirements (as given by @kragall ):
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
To store
data
in the Clearing House a Connector creates aLogMessage
and sends it together withdata
as the payload to the Clearing House. The Clearing House stores thisLogMessage
together with meta-data, such as a timestamp when it stored the data or theid
under whichdata
can be retrieved. This is illustrated here:The
LogEntry
contains bothLogMessage
and meta-data.Currently, when a Connector wants to retrieve
data
from the Clearing House it can query for it, and it will receive the storedLogMessage
. The meta-data that is part of theLogEntry
is not returned to the Connector. For various reasons it is desirable for the Connector to access the meta-data.Would it be possible to add something like
LogEntry
to the Information Model? Or is there another solution howLogMessage
and additional meta-data may be grouped together in a way that a receiving connector can process without additional logic?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: