Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with training model error: list indices must be integers or slices, not Loss. #42

Open
sonfack opened this issue Aug 18, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sonfack
Copy link

sonfack commented Aug 18, 2022

I try to train a model using :

model.train(losses=Loss.SUPERVISED)

Error on:

model.train(losses=Loss.SUPERVISED)

Error message:

list indices must be integers or slices, not Loss.

My code:

from lnn import And, Loss, Implies, Or, Equivalent, Fact, Predicates, Model, Variables, World
model = Model()

AgeGreat60 = Predicates('AgeGreat60')
IncomeLess400 = Predicates('IncomeLessthan400')
Risk = Predicates('Risk', arity=2)

# Variables
x = Variables('x')
y = Variables('y')
z = Variables('z')

# Risk(x,y) <---- AgeGreat60(x) AND IncomeLess400(y)

Root = Implies(Risk(x,y), And(AgeGreat60(x), IncomeLess400(y)))

formulae = [
Root
]
model.add_knowledge(*formulae, world=World.OPEN)
[#model](https://www.linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/?keywords=%23model).add_knowledge(Root)


# Data
model.add_data({
AgeGreat60: {
('70'): Fact.TRUE,
('30'): Fact.FALSE,
('20'): Fact.FALSE,
},
IncomeLess400: {
('300'): Fact.TRUE,
('600'): Fact.FALSE,
},
Risk: {
('70', '300'): Fact.TRUE,
('30', '600'): Fact.FALSE,
('60', '500'): (0.6, 0.2),
('65', '450'): (0.8, 1)
}
})


model.add_labels({
Risk: {
('70', '300'): Fact.TRUE,
('30', '600'): Fact.FALSE,
}
})

# train the model and output results
model.train(losses=Loss.SUPERVISED)
model.print(params=True)
@NaweedAghmad NaweedAghmad added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 5, 2022
@NaweedAghmad
Copy link
Collaborator

model.train(losses)
losses assumes that many losses are given, i.e. a list of losses.
losses=[Loss.SUPERVISED] solves this issue, but we should add an additional kwarg loss
that only accepts a single loss function.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants