Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

package conflicts #10

Open
daniel-spies opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

package conflicts #10

daniel-spies opened this issue Jun 13, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@daniel-spies
Copy link

Hi there, thanks for the nice tool!

in a new conda environment everything ran quite smooth and fast, though when coming to the point to also perform the downstream analysis with Dynamo I'd have to create yet another environment just because all your requirements are set for a specific version. Is this necessary or e.g. would pandas 1.3.5 also work which is required for the dynamo-relase version?

I understand that you supplied the exact version that ensure proper functionality of your software, though is limiting everything else.

so this is rather a feedback / feature request to be more lax on the versions

pipedeptree lists e.g. the following pandas requirements of cellDancer:

├── pandas [required: >=0.24.1, installed: 1.3.4]
├── pandas [required: >=1.1, installed: 1.3.4]
│ ├── pandas [required: >=1.1.1, installed: 1.3.4]
├── pandas [required: >=0.23,!=1.4.0, installed: 1.3.4]
│ │ ├── pandas [required: >=1.1.1, installed: 1.3.4]
│ ├── pandas [required: >=1.0, installed: 1.3.4]
│ │ ├── pandas [required: >=0.23, installed: 1.3.4]
│ │ ├── pandas [required: >=0.25, installed: 1.3.4]

cheers
Daniel

@Abclisy
Copy link
Member

Abclisy commented Jun 16, 2023

Thank you for the suggestion! We will improve this in the next version. We will publish a list of fixed dependencies versions that will let both Dynamo and cellDancer runnable.

Best,
Shengyu

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants