Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

h36m dataset and result reproduction #32

Open
henryfungusa opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

h36m dataset and result reproduction #32

henryfungusa opened this issue Mar 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@henryfungusa
Copy link

Hi, thanks for your insightful work. I was able to reproduce the paper's results on Coco dataset, and I am attempting to reproduce the results with H36m. However, I do not find any sample code nor instructions on that. Would you please help and share code or instruct on how you conducted the experiments on h36m?

@henryfungusa
Copy link
Author

I printed the output of the model of multi_gpu_test(). The predicted depth values of all the joints in the same box are the same, so the predictions are practically a 2-D pose, not a 3-D pose. I am very curious about how your H36m test was conducted.

@guzejungithub
Copy link

Hi, thanks for your insightful work. I was able to reproduce the paper's results on Coco dataset, and I am attempting to reproduce the results with H36m. However, I do not find any sample code nor instructions on that. Would you please help and share code or instruct on how you conducted the experiments on h36m?

Hello,

I am unable to reproduce the results for the COCO validation set. I obtained results of 75.9 (base gt_box=false) and 78.2 (base gt_box=true). Are you getting the same results? These results differ by 1.6 from 77.5.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants