You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[In County Audit Report] it might be useful to know how many votes each candidate received during the audit, and how many were discrepancies or not.
It's not clear to me what exactly the suggestion is: is it the candidate (audited) vote totals from audited ballot cards alone? Or total votes, "correcting" any discrepancies found during the audit? My guess is, for each candidate three columns:
Corrected vote total (original vote total plus net votes corrected by audit)
Number of cards whose audit increased the candidate's vote total
Number of cards whose audit decreased the candidate's vote total.
If I understand correctly, this would require tracking things we don't currently track (discrepancy per candidate, not just per contest).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tracking this information would require either (1) an almost complete rearchitecture of how audit results are actually computed and tracked over time, or (2) recalculation from scratch of these numbers every time a report is generated. I find neither to be a palatable option for the forseeable future.
I also don't believe that CDOS saying "it might be useful" makes this a "CDOS Priority." @dmzimmerman
I use "CDOS Priority" label to make sure that I close the loop with CDOS on anything they explicitly mention.
Feel free to change the name of the label to "CDOS Request", or to make a second label of that name, or to suggest some other solution. Just let me know.
(per RLA Tool Feedback #1_tool version2)
Suggestion (not requirement) from CDOS:
It's not clear to me what exactly the suggestion is: is it the candidate (audited) vote totals from audited ballot cards alone? Or total votes, "correcting" any discrepancies found during the audit? My guess is, for each candidate three columns:
If I understand correctly, this would require tracking things we don't currently track (discrepancy per candidate, not just per contest).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: