You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is important to comply with the latest convention decided in the CESM co-chairs group. time-stamps for history data that is averaged should be the middle of the interval, and time_bounds should be reported as the start and end of the interval. For instantaneous data (so history data output as "daily" with a daily time-step) the time-stamp should be the end of the interval, and time_bounds NOT included in output.
This was decided in co-chairs on 7/24/2023, and we want it to be put in place for all CESM components by end of Summer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I can make this happen fairly easily now (see PR #475 for standalone), but for now using average for aggregation of all variables because there is no capability to outputs into multiple output file streams.
This is important to comply with the latest convention decided in the CESM co-chairs group. time-stamps for history data that is averaged should be the middle of the interval, and time_bounds should be reported as the start and end of the interval. For instantaneous data (so history data output as "daily" with a daily time-step) the time-stamp should be the end of the interval, and time_bounds NOT included in output.
This was decided in co-chairs on 7/24/2023, and we want it to be put in place for all CESM components by end of Summer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: