Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jax-rs v2 support (for compatibility with jackson 2.13+) #91

Open
neowcng opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

jax-rs v2 support (for compatibility with jackson 2.13+) #91

neowcng opened this issue Jun 8, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@neowcng
Copy link

neowcng commented Jun 8, 2022

Greetings

We were using object-client 3.3.2 in a inhouse custom web application
Recently we upgraded the app framework to spring boot 2.7, which indirectly brings the upgrade of jackson 2.13
The jackson upgrade broke all functionalities of object-client due to the missing class javax/ws/rs/core/NoContentException (only appears jaxrs v2)

I notice that there is a commit to downgrading the jackson dependencies to 2.12
33f7674

The root cause of both issues are due to the fact that the object-client is still using jaxrs (Jersey) v1
Any roadmap or migration plan for upgrading to jaxrs / Jersey v2?

@dunedodo
Copy link
Contributor

dunedodo commented Jul 4, 2022

Thanks. We are going to kick off with upgrading Jersey, now working on dependency modules. We'll update here when it's done.

@code4t2
Copy link

code4t2 commented Feb 3, 2023

Adding a comment as many of our teams are facing the same issue

@eljakimlindenburg
Copy link

Adding another comment as our team is also facing the same issue

@dunedodo
Copy link
Contributor

dunedodo commented Dec 4, 2023

@neowcng @code4t2 @eljakimlindenburg Hello, object client version 4.0.0-rc.1, with Jersey 2.40, is for your Alpha Testing. Feel free to let us know if any issues are remaining from your side. Please note that it is not recommended to use it on any production environment. We will soon have a GA release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants