You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the Stealth Scanno checks is for \btb with th as a suggested replacement. I was puzzled at why I would want to replace <tb> with th until I realized this was for something like tbe. Perhaps a better search term would be \btb\w.
I feel this is very minor and could be added to a todo list after GG2 leaves beta.
Yes, I rarely use Stealth Scannos. The online PPtxt seems to be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks Rick - I just ported the scanno definitions from GG1 across to GG2, and \btb is one of those. I see the problem with it like it is, although your solution needs a little adjustment.
If we search for \btb\w it would find tbe, but if you did the replacement, tbe would go to th (i.e. losing the e).
However, I think it should be possible to use something like \btb(?=\w) so that the extra letter doesn't get included in the match. Some of the other scanno regexes have similar lookahead or lookbehind assertions.
One of the Stealth Scanno checks is for
\btb
withth
as a suggested replacement. I was puzzled at why I would want to replace<tb>
withth
until I realized this was for something liketbe
. Perhaps a better search term would be\btb\w
.I feel this is very minor and could be added to a todo list after GG2 leaves beta.
Yes, I rarely use Stealth Scannos. The online PPtxt seems to be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: