You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, all units for size fields are directly linked to the field and which unit it is, is specified in the field description. This is not useful, because the unit varies strongly depending on the object. It would be useful if every field that contains a size specification is linked to another field where the matching size unit can be selected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It depends which field we are talking about.
Fields that are from DarwinCore where the unit is specified in the specification must be used like that to ensure proper data integration and sharing using the standard.
Currently, all units for size fields are directly linked to the field and which unit it is, is specified in the field description. This is not useful, because the unit varies strongly depending on the object. It would be useful if every field that contains a size specification is linked to another field where the matching size unit can be selected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: