Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a configuration with separate CSS instances for different responsibilities #9

Open
RubenVerborgh opened this issue May 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Member

The CSS bundles several components such as a storage server, an identity provider, a WebID minter, an account manager, etc.
Can we create a configuration in which different CSS instances play these roles?

@RubenVerborgh RubenVerborgh added the enhancement New feature or request label May 29, 2022
@MisterTimn
Copy link
Collaborator

Interesting, are there examples of how CSS has to be setup to facilitate this? And is this behavior then also enforced by the CSS?

A configuration like this is possible but might also warrant a separate chart. We can re-use the CSS base chart as a dependency with aliases in a parent chart for that configuration.

@RubenVerborgh
Copy link
Member Author

I'll defer to @tomhgmns and @wouteraj, who suggested this idea.

@tomhgmns
Copy link
Member

Sorry, I only noticed you've mentioned me today!

Basically, the idea has both a philosophical and practical motivation.

Philosophically, Solid is designed to standardise interaction between storage, login methods, personal identifiers authorisation agents, authorisation servers and applications. The fact that the Community Solid Server bundles many of those component in one package very misleading with respect the purpose of the Solid standard. People that are exploring Solid by playing around with the CSS might not learn the most essential parts of Solid.

Practically, in our WebID service (i.e. use.id), we rely solely on the storage component of the CSS. We do not rely on the account management, IDP, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants