You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using more than one card, the requirement for reference input for the Decklinks to properly initialize don't seem to follow a clear logic.
If the video mode of the different cards is the same, reference is needed for it to work. If there is a different resolution then it initializes no problem.
This is a picture of the devices I am using for this test.
Devices 2,3,4,5 are the Decklink 8KPro, Device 1 is the Extreme 12G.
All we are doing in the code, is enabling a playback group for each device if the parent device supports it and for the secondary devices if they support it. (the check could do something internally such as checking for matching formats, I am unsure)
Then we are doing a "waiting for lock", either if explicitly enabled, or if on auto and the parent did enable a playback group.
So we aren't considering formats or anything here, which I suppose could be a bug, but knowing how it should behave in various scenarios is hard
Observed Behavior
When using more than one card, the requirement for reference input for the Decklinks to properly initialize don't seem to follow a clear logic.
If the video mode of the different cards is the same, reference is needed for it to work. If there is a different resolution then it initializes no problem.
This is a picture of the devices I am using for this test.
Devices 2,3,4,5 are the Decklink 8KPro, Device 1 is the Extreme 12G.
I'm using a custom video mode:
If the port of the Extreme 12G has the same size as the main device, this config only works with genlock at 25p.
Without proper reference input it throws an error:
So far so good, this is to be expected I guess.
The weird behaviour is when you set the port to a different size, suddenly the server starts no problem without any genlock present.
Is there anything in the SDK documentation that could explain this or it could be a bug?
Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: