You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would it be useful to have one df that had towns, their counties, their PUMAs, their metros, etc. Basically all the groupings that a town might belong to that also have GEOIDs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The xwalk data comes from the LODES crosswalk, just as a subset of the more useful columns. That does include metro area, but not PUMA, which I could do pretty easily.
Would it be useful to have one df that had towns, their counties, their PUMAs, their metros, etc. Basically all the groupings that a town might belong to that also have GEOIDs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: