You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The terms "effective setpoint" and "actual setpoint" seems to a lack of consensus on their meaning and/or purpose. Additionally, they are often used interchangeably, leading to potential confusion and misinterpretation.
I personally consider effective and actual setpoint to be equivalent to each other, therefore I will refer to "Effective Setpoint" from this point forward.
Current Understanding:
The effective setpoint refers to the "current" (active) setpoint in operation
It represents the setpoint value that the system is currently using to control its processes
Example:
A control system might have multiple setpoints, such as Occupied, Unoccupied, Standby, etc. At any given time, the effective setpoint would be the specific value from one of these setpoints depending on the mode that the system is currently using to maintain control.
It's important to note that the Effective Setpoint may not always be a static value directly taken from a predefined setpoint (Unoccupied, Occupied, Standby, etc.). In more advanced systems, and effective setpoint could be dynamically adjusted based on other inputs or conditions. Nonetheless, an Effective Setpoint is typically it's own Analog Value in a Bacnet network.
Gratned, this is just my own interpretation. I would like to hear differing perspectives and try to reach consensus on the definition of Effective/ Actual Setpoint.
Are Effective and Actual Setpoint equivalent?
Is Effective Setpoint simply the current setpoint being used by the control process?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the context that you're describing, Connor, I agree, they are equivalent
Is Effective Setpoint simply the current setpoint being used by the control process?
If it's just "effective setpoint", yes. There are, however, setpoints (though they should be called thresholds) in practice called "effective cooling setpoint" and "effective heating setpoint" which is the initial cooling or heating setpoint with a modifier. "Effective cooling setpoint" and "effective heating setpoint" exist simultaneously, along with "existing setpoint" which itself would have the value of "effective cooling setpoint" or "effective heating setpoint", depending on the current operating mode.
The terms "effective setpoint" and "actual setpoint" seems to a lack of consensus on their meaning and/or purpose. Additionally, they are often used interchangeably, leading to potential confusion and misinterpretation.
I personally consider effective and actual setpoint to be equivalent to each other, therefore I will refer to "Effective Setpoint" from this point forward.
Current Understanding:
Example:
A control system might have multiple setpoints, such as Occupied, Unoccupied, Standby, etc. At any given time, the effective setpoint would be the specific value from one of these setpoints depending on the mode that the system is currently using to maintain control.
Gratned, this is just my own interpretation. I would like to hear differing perspectives and try to reach consensus on the definition of Effective/ Actual Setpoint.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: