You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is indeed a problem. Semantically, "with foo and a bar" should be interpreted as "with foo and with a bar". This kind of ellipsis requires coordinations to denote sets of entities (instead of entities, as it is now the case), which requires an adaptation of the whole semantic composition process.
A hack would be to insert the ommitted "with"; however, there's no straightforward way to determine when and where to insert it...
Conjunction in conditions works, but only in limited cases:
Works perfectly:
"houses in Headington with more than 2 bedrooms and with a garden"
Works, but interprets "and a garden" as ?x is a garden
"houses in Headington with more than 2 bedrooms and a garden"
fails: "houses in Headington with a garden and more than 2 bedrooms"
works: "houses in Headington with a garden and with more than 2 bedrooms"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: