-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestions for a Better Reading Experience #647
Comments
In addition to always displaying the number of unread articles, I also recommend adding a feature to ReadYou that shows the total number of articles in a group. This is similar to the functionality in Reeder . Adding the total number of articles in a group provides a more comprehensive overview and helps users prioritize their reading: With this information, users can see how much progress they have made and how much more they have to read. |
@chavezet To do this, some of the code needs to be refactored, so this issue will probably be open for a long time |
Thank you for your prompt response. I understand that refactoring the code will take some time. However, I would like to request that this issue be prioritized as it would greatly improve the user experience of ReadYou. Here are some reasons why I believe this issue should be prioritized: It is a major usability issue: The current design makes it difficult for users to see how many articles need to be processed. |
I’ve only recently started using the app and I really like it but not having the article count on the groups is a real downside. For users who disable the setting Always expand, there is no indication how many new articles there are (or starred or overall but personally I don’t think those are as important). |
I propose that ReadYou always displays the number of unread articles regardless of the filter condition, whether it's "All," "Unread," or "Starred."
Here are the reasons:
The total number includes both read and unread articles, making it difficult to see how many articles need to be processed.
Users need to take extra time and steps to see the number of unread articles.
Users can see the number of unread articles at a glance, without any extra steps.
Users can decide which articles to prioritize based on the number of unread articles, which can improve work efficiency.
Reeder is a popular RSS reader that also uses this logic of always displaying the number of unread articles.
This shows that this logic meets user needs and can improve the user experience.
I suggest the following changes:
Change the article count in ReadYou to always display the number of unread articles.
Before:
All articles: 100
Unread articles: 20
Grouped article total: 100
After:
All articles: 20
Unread articles: 20
Grouped article total: 20
The modified interface is more concise and clear, and it can help users quickly understand how many articles need to be processed, which can improve work efficiency.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: