Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JSON locality missing locality remark #8398

Open
Jegelewicz opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

JSON locality missing locality remark #8398

Jegelewicz opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of the encountered error.

I added JSON locality to my search results and downloaded it. Most of the localities include a long locality remark, but this remark only showed up in a select few.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
1.https://arctos.database.museum/search.cfm?guid_prefix=UWBM%3AMamm&customoidoper=LIST
2. download
3. See https://arctos.database.museum/guid/UWBM:Mamm:72490 - note the remark:

Parsed by John Wieczorek from data provided by UWBM on 29 Jan 2002.; VERBATIMELEVATION: 260; VERBATIMLATITUDE: 4701 N; VERBATIMLONGITUDE: 11959 W; VERBATIMCOORDINATESYSTEM: degrees decinal minutes; GEOREFERENCEDBY: not recorded; GEOREFERENCESOURCES: not recorded; GEOREFERENCEVERIFICATIONSTATUS: requires verification"

See the row in the downloaded file for this record and note that the remark is not included
<[{"datum": "World Geodetic System 1984", "depth": null, "habitat": null, "elevation": "260-260 m", "began_date": "1994-05-13", "ended_date": "1994-05-13", "coordinates": "47.0166667000,-119.9833333000", "higher_geog": "United States, Washington, Grant County", "locality_id": 10853853, "assigned_date": "2017-07-11", "locality_name": null, "spec_locality": "Frenchman Coulee", "verbatim_date": "before 2017-07-11", "verified_date": null, "assigned_agent": "unknown", "verified_agent": null, "max_error_units": null, "coordinate_error": null, "event_attributes": null, "geog_auth_rec_id": 1130, "collecting_method": null, "collecting_source": null, "specimen_event_id": 3613143, "verbatim_locality": "USA | Washington | Grant | Frenchman Coulee", "max_error_distance": null, "verificationstatus": null, "locality_attributes": [{"attribute_date": null, "attribute_type": "georeference source", "attribute_units": null, "attribute_value": "unknown", "attribute_method": null, "attribute_remark": null, "attribute_determiner": null}], "specimen_event_type": "collection", "georeference_protocol": "not recorded"}]>

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Data
If this involves external data, attach the actual data that caused the problem. Do not attach a transformation or subset. You may ZIP most formats to attach, or request a Box email address for very large files.

ArctosDataOKwoxrzLw.zip

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS]
  • Browser [e.g. chrome, safari]
  • Version [e.g. 22]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added the Bug Arctos is not performing as it should. label Jan 6, 2025
@dustymc dustymc removed the Bug Arctos is not performing as it should. label Jan 6, 2025
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Next AWG Meeting milestone Jan 6, 2025
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Jan 6, 2025

locality_remarks is commented out of getJsonEventBySpecimen which makes me think removal was intentional, but I can't find any further information.

Adding it (back??) would require a bit more storage and CPU, probably both negligible. Proceeding seems reasonable to me, but isn't a technical issue. Adding to AGW agenda for further guidance.

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member Author

I advocate for adding it - otherwise a download does not actually provide all of the locality information. Is there any way to get the locality remark in a record download?

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Jan 6, 2025

Is there any way

If the data are fairly simple - locality_remarks is available in results.

@dustymc dustymc changed the title Bug Report: JSON locality missing locality remark JSON locality missing locality remark Jan 7, 2025
@mkoo
Copy link
Member

mkoo commented Jan 8, 2025

I remember that it JSON was too cumbersome for folks to deal wtih as well as not used very often so it was removed from downloads. But I'm ok to add if people request it/ want it. How awful to make an option?

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member Author

JSON was too cumbersome

The JSON is there, it just lacks the locality remark.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants